Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to RE/MAX Holdings Inc
How RE/MAX Holdings Inc stacks up
RMAX · against 759 other Real Estate companies
Profitability
70/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #225 of 760 · scores higher than 70% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score76 peers with a profitability score of 70–79, including RMAX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 70?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its return on assets and return on invested capital, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 63% of peers. Operating margin: 15.6% vs peer median 26.8%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 74% of peers. Return on invested capital: 5.3% vs peer median 3.4%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 90% of peers. Return on assets: 5.0% vs peer median 2.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RMAX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RMAX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 739 reported | 5.3% | 3.4% | 74% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 728 reported | 15.6% | 26.8% | 37% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 741 reported | 5.0% | 2.1% | 90% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 721 reported | Not reported | 5.2% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 763 reported | 75.5% | 53.9% | 78% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RMAX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 310M USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 17.42T IDR (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 12.2B BRL (≈$2.2B) | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 609.8B INR (≈$7.3B) | 100 | 78 | |
| 5 | 91.4B HKD (≈$11.7B) | 99 | 79 | |
| 225 | 1.3B SGD (≈$961M) | 70 | 62 | |
| 225 | 1.1B EUR (≈$1.2B) | 70 | 65 | |
| 225 | 1.6B EUR (≈$1.7B) | 70 | 58 | |
| 225 | 7.2B SEK (≈$720M) | 70 | 56 | |
| 225 | 681M USD | 70 | 52 | |
| 225 | 48.0B USD | 70 | 44 | |
| 233 | 913M NZD (≈$548M) | 69 | 57 | |
| 233 | 1.7B EUR (≈$1.9B) | 69 | 55 | |
| 233 | 57.1B SEK (≈$5.7B) | 69 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score