Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Gladstone Capital Corporation
How Gladstone Capital Corporation stacks up
GLAD · against 268 other Financial Services companies
Valuation
61/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #105 of 269 · scores higher than 61% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score27 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including GLAD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 61?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, which is stronger than most Financial Services peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -34.8% vs peer median 6.1%
- EBITDA yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 78% of peers. Earnings yield: 11.1% vs peer median 5.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GLAD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GLAD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 410 reported | 11.1% | 5.6% | 78% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 206 reported | Not reported | 6.8% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 183 reported | -34.8% | 6.1% | 3% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 401 reported | 112.3% | 83.1% | 68% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GLAD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 498M USD | 100 | 90 | |
| 1 | 641M USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 82M USD | 99 | 78 | |
| 3 | 827M USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 3 | 659M USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 102 | 15.9B USD | 62 | 53 | |
| 102 | 3.1B USD | 62 | 63 | |
| 102 | 1.5B USD | 62 | 58 | |
| 105 | 3.8B GBP (≈$4.9B) | 61 | 55 | |
| 105 | 433M USD | 61 | 46 | |
| 107 | 1.25T CLP (≈$1.4B) | 60 | ||
| 107 | 584M AUD (≈$385M) | 60 | 61 | |
| 107 | 1.2B EUR (≈$1.3B) | 60 | 59 | |
| 110 | 538M USD | 59 | 43 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score