Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Crawford & Company
How Crawford & Company stacks up
CRD-A · against 268 other Financial Services companies
Valuation
59/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #110 of 269 · scores higher than 59% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score27 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including CRD-A · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 59?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.A mix: stronger EBITDA yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Financial Services peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 62% of peers. Earnings yield: 4.2% vs peer median 5.7%
- Free cash flow yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 70% of peers. EBITDA yield: 10.6% vs peer median 6.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CRD-A, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CRD-A | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 410 reported | 4.2% | 5.6% | 38% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 206 reported | 10.6% | 6.8% | 70% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 183 reported | Not reported | 6.1% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 401 reported | 34.0% | 83.1% | 26% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CRD-A| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 498M USD | 100 | 90 | |
| 1 | 641M USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 82M USD | 99 | 78 | |
| 3 | 827M USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 3 | 659M USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 105 | 433M USD | 61 | 46 | |
| 107 | 1.25T CLP (≈$1.4B) | 60 | ||
| 107 | 584M AUD (≈$385M) | 60 | 61 | |
| 107 | 1.2B EUR (≈$1.3B) | 60 | 59 | |
| 110 | 538M USD | 59 | 43 | |
| 110 | 505M AUD (≈$334M) | 59 | 55 | |
| 110 | 7.1B USD | 59 | 68 | |
| 113 | 773M USD | 58 | 54 | |
| 113 | 2.0B AUD (≈$1.4B) | 58 | 51 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score