Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Patria Investments Limited
How Patria Investments Limited stacks up
PAX · against 268 other Financial Services companies
Valuation
62/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #102 of 269 · scores higher than 62% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score27 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including PAX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 62?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Financial Services peers.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.8% vs peer median 5.7%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 68% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 12.1% vs peer median 6.1%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 70% of peers. EBITDA yield: 10.4% vs peer median 6.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = PAX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | PAX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 410 reported | 4.8% | 5.6% | 45% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 206 reported | 10.4% | 6.8% | 70% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 183 reported | 12.1% | 6.1% | 68% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 401 reported | 37.3% | 83.1% | 28% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around PAX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 498M USD | 100 | 90 | |
| 1 | 641M USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 82M USD | 99 | 78 | |
| 3 | 827M USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 3 | 659M USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 99 | 67.7B BRL (≈$12.2B) | 63 | 57 | |
| 99 | 577M EUR (≈$635M) | 63 | 67 | |
| 102 | 15.9B USD | 62 | 53 | |
| 102 | 3.1B USD | 62 | 63 | |
| 102 | 1.5B USD | 62 | 58 | |
| 105 | 3.8B GBP (≈$4.9B) | 61 | 55 | |
| 105 | 433M USD | 61 | 46 | |
| 107 | 1.25T CLP (≈$1.4B) | 60 | ||
| 107 | 584M AUD (≈$385M) | 60 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score