Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to G-III Apparel Group, Ltd.
How G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. stacks up
GIII · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Growth
51/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #206 of 356 · scores higher than 41% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score36 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including GIII · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 51?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- Earnings per share turned from a loss to a profit. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 4.2%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 87% of peers. Revenue growth: -8.7% vs peer median 3.7%
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 81% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -3.8% vs peer median 4.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GIII, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GIII | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 358 reported | -8.7% | 5.9% | 6% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 249 reported | -64.0% | 6.2% | 8% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 353 reported | -3.8% | 4.1% | 15% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GIII| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 4 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 4 | 293M USD | 99 | 89 | |
| 203 | 44.1B USD | 52 | 35 | |
| 203 | 965M USD | 52 | 50 | |
| 206 | 5.9B USD | 51 | 49 | |
| 206 | 383M USD | 51 | 40 | |
| 206 | 1.3B USD | 51 | 65 | |
| 206 | 22.7B USD | 51 | 55 | |
| 210 | 10.7B USD | 50 | 50 | |
| 211 | 14.0B USD | 49 | 47 | |
| 211 | 433M USD | 49 | 43 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score