Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to CGI Inc.
How CGI Inc. stacks up
GIB · against 178 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
47/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #134 of 179 · scores higher than 25% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score18 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including GIB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 47?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 63% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 0.5% vs peer median 11.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 8.4% vs peer median 8.5%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 7.3% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GIB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GIB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 181 reported | 8.4% | 16.2% | 30% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 157 reported | 0.5% | 20.2% | 26% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 177 reported | 7.3% | 10.4% | 40% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GIB| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 2 | 835.6B TWD (≈$25.9B) | 98 | 80 | |
| 2 | 101.7B CNY (≈$14.2B) | 98 | 63 | |
| 2 | 983.8B TWD (≈$30.5B) | 98 | 65 | |
| 2 | 23.2B USD | 98 | 65 | |
| 127 | 20.2B USD | 50 | 50 | |
| 131 | 14.9B USD | 48 | 53 | |
| 131 | 30.8B USD | 48 | 59 | |
| 131 | 17.8B USD | 48 | 25 | |
| 134 | 16.8B USD | 47 | 66 | |
| 135 | 32.5B USD | 46 | 43 | |
| 135 | 28.4B USD | 46 | 50 | |
| 135 | 15.6B USD | 46 | 48 | |
| 138 | 114.4B CNY (≈$16.0B) | 45 | 51 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score