Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Flex Ltd.
How Flex Ltd. stacks up
FLEX · against 1,668 other Technology companies
Growth
46/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #894 of 1,669 · scores higher than 46% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score167 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including FLEX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 46?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.A mix: stronger revenue growth, but weaker 3-year revenue growth than most Technology peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 64% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 1.0% vs peer median 4.8%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 11.0% vs peer median 11.1%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 62% of peers. Revenue growth: 12.2% vs peer median 8.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FLEX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FLEX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,689 reported | 12.2% | 8.5% | 62% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,071 reported | 11.0% | 11.1% | 50% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,659 reported | 1.0% | 4.8% | 36% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FLEX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 241.8B CNY (≈$33.9B) | 100 | 85 | |
| 1 | 37.0B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 40.5B USD | 100 | 75 | |
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 894 | 22.4B HKD (≈$2.9B) | 46 | 47 | |
| 894 | 113.6B JPY (≈$772M) | 46 | 74 | |
| 894 | 5.9B USD | 46 | 55 | |
| 894 | 155.8B USD | 46 | 63 | |
| 894 | 32.5B USD | 46 | 43 | |
| 894 | 407M CAD (≈$297M) | 46 | 25 | |
| 894 | 176M GBP (≈$228M) | 46 | 19 | |
| 894 | 28.4B USD | 46 | 50 | |
| 894 | 15.6B USD | 46 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score