Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to CGI Inc.
How CGI Inc. stacks up
GIB · against 1,668 other Technology companies
Growth
47/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #877 of 1,669 · scores higher than 47% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score167 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including GIB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 47?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 63% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 0.5% vs peer median 11.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 8.4% vs peer median 8.5%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 7.3% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GIB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GIB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,689 reported | 8.4% | 8.5% | 50% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,071 reported | 0.5% | 11.1% | 37% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,659 reported | 7.3% | 4.8% | 58% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GIB| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 241.8B CNY (≈$33.9B) | 100 | 85 | |
| 1 | 37.0B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 40.5B USD | 100 | 75 | |
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 877 | 2.5B CNY (≈$347M) | 47 | 36 | |
| 877 | 410.6B JPY (≈$2.8B) | 47 | 61 | |
| 877 | 108.9B JPY (≈$740M) | 47 | 76 | |
| 877 | 42.6B JPY (≈$290M) | 47 | 70 | |
| 877 | 16.8B USD | 47 | 66 | |
| 877 | 6.2B USD | 47 | 53 | |
| 894 | 19.1B CNY (≈$2.7B) | 46 | 30 | |
| 894 | 28.4B CNY (≈$4.0B) | 46 | 59 | |
| 894 | 192M HKD (≈$25M) | 46 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score