Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Graham Holdings Company
How Graham Holdings Company stacks up
GHC · against 2,399 other Industrials companies
Growth
42/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #1,381 of 2,400 · scores higher than 42% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score240 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including GHC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 42?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 76% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -19.4% vs peer median 7.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.8% vs peer median 4.4%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 6.4% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GHC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GHC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 2,422 reported | 4.8% | 4.4% | 51% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,764 reported | -19.4% | 7.1% | 24% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 2,385 reported | 6.4% | 4.2% | 59% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GHC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.9B CNY (≈$682M) | 100 | 44 | |
| 1 | 9.4B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 74.1B TWD (≈$2.3B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 1 | 22.5B NOK (≈$2.1B) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1,381 | 15.4B USD | 42 | 54 | |
| 1,381 | 518M AUD (≈$342M) | 42 | 58 | |
| 1,381 | 297.1B SEK (≈$29.7B) | 42 | 53 | |
| 1,381 | Unavailable | 42 | 55 | |
| 1,381 | 5.1B USD | 42 | 54 | |
| 1,381 | 138.4B INR (≈$1.7B) | 42 | 57 | |
| 1,381 | 618M EUR (≈$680M) | 42 | ||
| 1,381 | 130M EUR (≈$143M) | 42 | 41 | |
| 1,405 | 26.7B CNY (≈$3.7B) | 41 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score