Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
FTS · against 359 other Utilities companies
Ranked #257 of 360 · scores higher than 29% of peers · safety percentile 29
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)36 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including FTS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio, which is weaker than most Utilities peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | FTS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 354 reported | 1.32× | 1.21× | 44% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 347 reported | 0.41 | 0.40 | 49% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 347 reported | 0.56× | 1.05× | 16% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.9B CNY (≈$260M) | 99 | 44 | |
| 1 | 1.6B BRL (≈$297M) | 99 | 85 | |
| 1 | 1.6B BRL (≈$286M) | 99 | 44 | |
| 1 | 369M USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2.7B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 253 | 52.0B USD | 30 | 39 | |
| 254 | 60.2B JPY (≈$409M) | 30 | 19 | |
| 255 | 93.3B USD | 29 | 50 | |
| 256 | 5.4B USD | 29 | 56 | |
| 257 | 30.5B USD | 29 | 45 | |
| 258 | 12.5B USD | 28 | 69 | |
| 259 | 20.1B THB (≈$562M) | 28 | 23 | |
| 260 | 630.0B JPY (≈$4.3B) | 28 | 34 | |
| 261 | 13.1B USD | 28 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score