Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Fortis Inc.
How Fortis Inc. stacks up
FTS · against 351 other Utilities companies
Growth
57/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #151 of 352 · scores higher than 57% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score35 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including FTS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 57?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.Its metrics sit close to the Utilities norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 5.6% vs peer median 1.7%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 3.3% vs peer median 2.0%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 61% of peers. Revenue growth: 5.8% vs peer median 2.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FTS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FTS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 354 reported | 5.8% | 2.5% | 61% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 284 reported | 5.6% | 1.6% | 58% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 351 reported | 3.3% | 2.0% | 59% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FTS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 48.3B BRL (≈$8.7B) | 100 | 69 | |
| 1 | 9.1B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 3 | 7.9B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 85 | |
| 3 | 636M EUR (≈$700M) | 99 | 64 | |
| 3 | 2.5B USD | 99 | 41 | |
| 147 | 134.5B TRY (≈$4.0B) | 58 | 75 | |
| 147 | 2.5B USD | 58 | 52 | |
| 151 | 4.1B CNY (≈$568M) | 57 | 51 | |
| 151 | 85.8B CNY (≈$12.0B) | 57 | 42 | |
| 151 | 30.5B USD | 57 | 45 | |
| 154 | 1.6B EUR (≈$1.8B) | 56 | 65 | |
| 154 | 22.0B USD | 56 | 44 | |
| 154 | Unavailable | 56 | 38 | |
| 154 | 8.2B USD | 56 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score