Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
PNW · against 359 other Utilities companies
Ranked #261 of 360 · scores higher than 28% of peers · safety percentile 28
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)36 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including PNW · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Utilities peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | PNW | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 354 reported | 2.33× | 1.21× | 13% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 347 reported | 0.44 | 0.40 | 47% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 347 reported | 0.59× | 1.05× | 19% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.9B CNY (≈$260M) | 99 | 44 | |
| 1 | 1.6B BRL (≈$297M) | 99 | 85 | |
| 1 | 1.6B BRL (≈$286M) | 99 | 44 | |
| 1 | 369M USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2.7B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 257 | 30.5B USD | 29 | 45 | |
| 258 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 12.5B USD |
| 28 |
| 69 |
| 259 | 20.1B THB (≈$562M) | 28 | 23 |
| 260 | 630.0B JPY (≈$4.3B) | 28 | 34 |
| 261 | 13.1B USD | 28 | 46 |
| 262 | 8.2B USD | 27 | 56 |
| 263 | 19.7B USD | 27 | 46 |
| 264 | 37.6B USD | 27 | 43 |
| 265 | 5.4B EUR (≈$6.0B) | 26 | 40 |