Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to FTAI Aviation Ltd.
How FTAI Aviation Ltd. stacks up
FTAI · against 2,393 other Industrials companies
Valuation
27/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #1,736 of 2,394 · scores higher than 27% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score239 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including FTAI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 27?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its free cash flow yield, EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -2.3% vs peer median 3.7%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 69% of peers. EBITDA yield: 4.0% vs peer median 6.9%
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 65% of peers. Earnings yield: 2.4% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FTAI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FTAI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 2,368 reported | 2.3% | 3.8% | 35% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 2,432 reported | 4.2% | 7.0% | 31% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 795 reported | -4.3% | 3.7% | 17% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 2,381 reported | 2.0% | 50.5% | 2% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FTAI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 704.9B KRW (≈$508M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 1 | 281.4B KRW (≈$203M) | 100 | 38 | |
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 42.1B TRY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1,736 | 24.6B USD | 27 | 49 | |
| 1,736 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score