Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
How Casella Waste Systems, Inc. stacks up
CWST · against 2,393 other Industrials companies
Valuation
27/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #1,736 of 2,394 · scores higher than 27% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score239 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including CWST · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 27?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 80% of peers. Earnings yield: 0.1% vs peer median 3.8%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 67% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 1.7% vs peer median 3.7%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 5.2% vs peer median 6.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CWST, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CWST | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 2,368 reported | 0.1% | 3.8% | 20% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 2,432 reported | 5.6% | 7.0% | 40% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 795 reported | 1.7% | 3.7% | 33% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 2,381 reported | 25.8% | 50.5% | 25% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CWST| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 704.9B KRW (≈$508M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 1 | 281.4B KRW (≈$203M) | 100 | 38 | |
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 42.1B TRY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1,736 | 1.2B NZD (≈$747M) | 27 | 23 | |
| 1,736 | 235M USD | 27 | 43 | |
| 1,736 | 24.6B USD | 27 | 49 | |
| 1,736 | 2.4B USD | 27 | 33 | |
| 1,736 | 6.1B USD | 27 | 34 | |
| 1,736 | 60.0B USD | 27 | 71 | |
| 1,736 | 20.6B USD | 27 | 61 | |
| 1,736 | 536M USD | 27 | 28 | |
| 1,736 | 4.5B USD | 27 | 29 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score