Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TRNS · against 2,393 other Industrials companies
Ranked #1,736 of 2,394 · scores higher than 27% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score239 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including TRNS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
| Metric | TRNS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 2,368 reported | 0.4% | 3.8% | 22% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 2,432 reported | 4.4% | 7.0% | 32% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 795 reported | 3.0% | 3.7% | 44% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 2,381 reported | 36.0% | 50.5% | 36% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 704.9B KRW (≈$508M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 1 | 281.4B KRW (≈$203M) | 100 | 38 | |
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 42.1B TRY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1,736 | 20.6B USD | 27 | 61 | |
| 1,736 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 536M USD |
| 27 |
| 28 |
| 1,736 | 4.5B USD | 27 | 29 |
| 1,736 | 2.3B USD | 27 | 24 |
| 1,736 | 838M USD | 27 | 44 |
| 1,736 | 90.8B USD | 27 | 59 |
| 1,760 | 5.9B CNY (≈$833M) | 26 | 48 |
| 1,760 | 5.3B CNY (≈$746M) | 26 | 42 |
| 1,760 | 9.5B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 26 | 39 |