Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
FR · against 183 other Real Estate companies listed in US-listed
Ranked #77 of 184 · scores higher than 58% of peers · safety percentile 39
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)26 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including FR · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | FR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 177 reported | 0.90× | 1.12× | 62% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 179 reported | 1.04 | 1.02 | 47% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 185 reported | 1.50× | 1.22× | 56% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 2 | 354M USD | 97 | 41 | |
| 3 | 2.5B USD | 97 | 88 | |
| 4 | 3.3B USD | 97 | 78 | |
| 5 | 26.9B USD | 97 | 78 | |
| 73 | 14.7B USD | 40 | 61 | |
| 74 | 48.0B USD |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 40 |
| 44 |
| 75 | 14.6B USD | 39 | 28 |
| 76 | Unavailable | 39 | 73 |
| 77 | 7.5B USD | 39 | 61 |
| 78 | 2.8B USD | 38 | 68 |
| 79 | 3.6B USD | 38 | 33 |
| 80 | 68.1B USD | 38 | 33 |
| 81 | 2.1B USD | 37 | 32 |