Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
FRT-PC · against 750 other Real Estate companies
Ranked #457 of 751 · scores higher than 39% of peers · safety percentile 39
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)75 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including FRT-PC · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | FRT-PC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 733 reported | 1.34× | 0.82× | 24% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 742 reported | 0.92 | 0.69 | 32% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 751 reported | 0.56× | 1.20× | 25% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.5B HKD (≈$5.6B) | 100 | 42 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 3 | 1.7B THB (≈$47M) | 100 | 84 | |
| 4 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 5 | 2.0B HKD (≈$257M) | 99 | 55 | |
| 453 | 1.3B EUR (≈$1.4B) | 40 | 67 | |
| 454 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 672M GBP (≈$873M) |
| 40 |
| 44 |
| 455 | 14.6B USD | 39 | 28 |
| 456 | 1.8B EUR (≈$2.0B) | 39 | 28 |
| 457 | Unavailable | 39 | 73 |
| 458 | 9.6B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 39 | 12 |
| 459 | 7.5B USD | 39 | 61 |
| 460 | 13.7B HKD (≈$1.8B) | 39 | 33 |
| 461 | 1.4B EUR (≈$1.5B) | 39 | 54 |