Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
How Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. stacks up
EXPD · against 445 other Industrials companies listed in US-listed
Growth
45/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #284 of 446 · scores higher than 35% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score51 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including EXPD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 45?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 74% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -1.6% vs peer median 4.2%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 12.5% vs peer median 7.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 6.8% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EXPD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EXPD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 462 reported | 6.8% | 8.4% | 43% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 328 reported | 12.5% | 9.2% | 53% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 437 reported | -1.6% | 5.2% | 17% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EXPD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 1 | 2.5B USD | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 727M USD | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 5.2B USD | 100 | 56 | |
| 280 | 21.1B USD | 46 | 50 | |
| 280 | 1.1B USD | 46 | 39 | |
| 280 | 29.2B USD | 46 | 50 | |
| 284 | 114M USD | 45 | 47 | |
| 284 | 26.6B USD | 45 | 55 | |
| 284 | 4.1B USD | 45 | 59 | |
| 284 | 6.7B USD | 45 | 53 | |
| 284 | 384M USD | 45 | 48 | |
| 284 | 68.5B USD | 45 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score