Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Exponent, Inc.
How Exponent, Inc. stacks up
EXPO · against 2,399 other Industrials companies
Growth
45/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #1,309 of 2,400 · scores higher than 45% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score240 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including EXPO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 45?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 62% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -1.9% vs peer median 7.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.2% vs peer median 4.4%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.3% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EXPO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EXPO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 2,422 reported | 4.2% | 4.4% | 49% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,764 reported | -1.9% | 7.1% | 38% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 2,385 reported | 4.3% | 4.2% | 50% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EXPO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.9B CNY (≈$682M) | 100 | 44 | |
| 1 | 9.4B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 74.1B TWD (≈$2.3B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 1 | 22.5B NOK (≈$2.1B) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1,309 | 88.7B JPY (≈$603M) | 45 | 64 | |
| 1,309 | 114M USD | 45 | 47 | |
| 1,309 | 82.2B ZAR (≈$4.5B) | 45 | 59 | |
| 1,309 | 26.6B USD | 45 | 55 | |
| 1,309 | 4.1B USD | 45 | 59 | |
| 1,309 | 1.6B BRL (≈$283M) | 45 | 53 | |
| 1,309 | 6.7B USD | 45 | 53 | |
| 1,309 | 2.8B GBP (≈$3.6B) | 45 | 60 | |
| 1,309 | 384M USD | 45 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score