Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Etsy, Inc.
How Etsy, Inc. stacks up
ETSY · against 223 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
30/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #196 of 224 · scores higher than 12% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score24 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including ETSY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 30?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, which is weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 87% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -40.9% vs peer median 4.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 2.7% vs peer median 3.7%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.0% vs peer median 4.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ETSY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ETSY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 224 reported | 2.7% | 5.9% | 31% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 194 reported | -40.9% | 6.5% | 10% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 223 reported | 4.0% | 6.4% | 36% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ETSY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15.2B USD | 99 | 57 | |
| 1 | 9.3B USD | 99 | 43 | |
| 3 | 17.6B SAR (≈$4.8B) | 98 | 68 | |
| 3 | 4.0B EUR (≈$4.4B) | 98 | 41 | |
| 3 | 7.0B USD | 98 | 59 | |
| 192 | 587.5B JPY (≈$4.0B) | 32 | 57 | |
| 192 | 10.9B USD | 32 | 47 | |
| 192 | 4.9B USD | 32 | 51 | |
| 192 | 6.2B USD | 32 | 69 | |
| 196 | 7.7B USD | 30 | 42 | |
| 196 | 13.8B USD | 30 | 66 | |
| 198 | 918.2B JPY (≈$6.2B) | 29 | 24 | |
| 199 | 52.0B CNY (≈$7.3B) | 28 | 41 | |
| 199 | 7.9B USD | 28 | 31 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score