Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Equity Residential
How Equity Residential stacks up
EQR · against 39 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Growth
49/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #31 of 40 · scores higher than 21% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score5 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including EQR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 49?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 8.1% vs peer median 11.2%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.2% vs peer median 3.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 3.8% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EQR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EQR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 40 reported | 3.8% | 4.6% | 33% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 35 reported | 8.1% | 22.6% | 32% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 40 reported | 4.2% | 5.4% | 36% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EQR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34.7B USD | 98 | 45 | |
| 1 | 13.7B USD | 98 | 70 | |
| 3 | 15.2B USD | 97 | 66 | |
| 4 | 13.2B USD | 92 | 63 | |
| 4 | 12.9B EUR (≈$14.2B) | 92 | 63 | |
| 27 | 26.9B USD | 51 | 78 | |
| 29 | 19.6B USD | 50 | 48 | |
| 29 | 14.8B USD | 50 | 51 | |
| 31 | 2.85T JPY (≈$19.4B) | 49 | 67 | |
| 31 | 24.6B USD | 49 | 42 | |
| 33 | 26.3B USD | 47 | 41 | |
| 34 | 48.0B USD | 46 | 44 | |
| 35 | 18.1B SGD (≈$13.8B) | 43 | 55 | |
| 36 | 18.3B USD | 34 | 38 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score