Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
How AvalonBay Communities, Inc. stacks up
VMRK · against 730 other Real Estate companies
Growth
46/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #392 of 731 · scores higher than 46% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score73 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including VMRK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 46?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 72% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -11.9% vs peer median 11.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.4% vs peer median 3.0%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 5.4% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = VMRK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | VMRK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 741 reported | 4.4% | 3.0% | 54% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 464 reported | -11.9% | 11.1% | 28% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 718 reported | 5.4% | 3.8% | 57% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around VMRK| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 65.5B INR (≈$786M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 6.3B THB (≈$176M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 1 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 60 | |
| 5 | 3.1B CNY (≈$440M) | 99 | 67 | |
| 392 | 314.6B JPY (≈$2.1B) | 46 | 75 | |
| 392 | 12.1B USD | 46 | 43 | |
| 392 | 676M SGD (≈$514M) | 46 | 43 | |
| 392 | 263M CHF (≈$302M) | 46 | 39 | |
| 392 | 48.0B USD | 46 | 44 | |
| 399 | 1.2B SAR (≈$330M) | 45 | 53 | |
| 399 | 11.2B SGD (≈$8.5B) | 45 | 52 | |
| 399 | 913M NZD (≈$548M) | 45 | 57 | |
| 399 | 13.5B SEK (≈$1.3B) | 45 | 37 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score