Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to AvalonBay Communities Inc
How AvalonBay Communities Inc stacks up
AVB · against 730 other Real Estate companies
Growth
47/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #385 of 731 · scores higher than 47% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score73 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including AVB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 47?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 66% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -2.6% vs peer median 11.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.4% vs peer median 3.0%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 5.4% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AVB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AVB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 741 reported | 4.4% | 3.0% | 54% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 464 reported | -2.6% | 11.1% | 34% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 718 reported | 5.4% | 3.8% | 57% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AVB| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 65.5B INR (≈$786M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 6.3B THB (≈$176M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 1 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 60 | |
| 5 | 3.1B CNY (≈$440M) | 99 | 67 | |
| 377 | 37.8B THB (≈$1.1B) | 48 | 62 | |
| 385 | 277.6B JPY (≈$1.9B) | 47 | 55 | |
| 385 | 227.1B JPY (≈$1.5B) | 47 | 44 | |
| 385 | 89.0B JPY (≈$605M) | 47 | 47 | |
| 385 | 26.3B USD | 47 | 41 | |
| 385 | 1.8B USD | 47 | 34 | |
| 385 | 1.1B USD | 47 | 43 | |
| 385 | 1.4B CHF (≈$1.7B) | 47 | 57 | |
| 392 | 212.0B JPY (≈$1.4B) | 46 | 41 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score