Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Equinor ASA
How Equinor ASA stacks up
EQNR · against 31 other Energy companies of similar size
Growth
26/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #29 of 32 · scores higher than 10% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score4 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including EQNR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 26?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 81% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -11.0% vs peer median -1.3%
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 74% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -32.6% vs peer median 1.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 2.6% vs peer median 0.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EQNR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EQNR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 32 reported | 2.6% | 8.7% | 35% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 32 reported | -32.6% | 9.0% | 3% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 32 reported | -11.0% | -1.4% | 3% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EQNR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 120.0B USD | 94 | 62 | |
| 1 | 109.0B USD | 94 | 58 | |
| 3 | 111.6B USD | 92 | 70 | |
| 4 | 58.0B USD | 91 | 48 | |
| 5 | 60.4B USD | 89 | 77 | |
| 25 | 1.14T HKD (≈$146.3B) | 35 | 79 | |
| 25 | 89.1B USD | 35 | 59 | |
| 27 | 56.7B USD | 34 | 57 | |
| 28 | 934.4B HKD (≈$119.6B) | 27 | 58 | |
| 29 | 108.0B USD | 26 | 55 | |
| 30 | 204.7B USD | 25 | 44 | |
| 31 | 83.6B USD | 22 | 41 | |
| 32 | 122.6B USD | 15 | 32 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score