Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to eBay Inc.
How eBay Inc. stacks up
EBAY · against 52 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
68/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #24 of 53 · scores higher than 54% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score11 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including EBAY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 68?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 5.2% vs peer median 4.2%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 6.5% vs peer median 4.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 83% of peers. Revenue growth: 14.7% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = EBAY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | EBAY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 53 reported | 14.7% | 8.5% | 77% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 47 reported | 5.2% | 5.6% | 46% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 53 reported | 6.5% | 9.9% | 29% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around EBAY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 3 | 38.3B USD | 99 | 57 | |
| 4 | 73.8B EUR (≈$81.2B) | 98 | 58 | |
| 5 | 880.5B TWD (≈$27.3B) | 97 | 75 | |
| 20 | 34.0B USD | 74 | 52 | |
| 22 | 678.2B CNY (≈$94.9B) | 70 | 69 | |
| 22 | 216.5B HKD (≈$27.7B) | 70 | 76 | |
| 24 | 3.98T JPY (≈$27.1B) | 68 | 74 | |
| 24 | 52.8B USD | 68 | 52 | |
| 26 | 659.6B HKD (≈$84.4B) | 67 | 72 | |
| 27 | 72.8B USD | 66 | 62 | |
| 28 | 4.04T JPY (≈$27.5B) | 65 | 76 | |
| 29 | 72.8B USD | 64 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score