Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Dorchester Minerals, L.P.
How Dorchester Minerals, L.P. stacks up
DMLP · against 109 other Energy companies of similar size
Valuation
57/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #44 of 110 · scores higher than 61% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score15 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including DMLP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 57?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Its metrics sit close to the Energy norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 12.1% vs peer median 12.1%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 6.3% vs peer median 5.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 78% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 11.3% vs peer median 6.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DMLP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DMLP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 108 reported | 6.2% | 5.3% | 56% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 111 reported | 12.1% | 12.9% | 44% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 63 reported | 11.3% | 4.2% | 82% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 108 reported | 22.7% | 71.8% | 11% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DMLP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 942M USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 1 | 64.6B THB (≈$1.8B) | 99 | 78 | |
| 3 | 1.1B USD | 98 | 55 | |
| 3 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 98 | 98 | |
| 5 | 2.1B AUD (≈$1.4B) | 97 | 68 | |
| 40 | 1.2B USD | 59 | 32 | |
| 40 | 1.2B USD | 59 | 49 | |
| 42 | 2.7B USD | 58 | 21 | |
| 42 | 697M USD | 58 | 50 | |
| 44 | 1.4B USD | 57 | 80 | |
| 45 | 140.4B JPY (≈$955M) | 56 | 54 | |
| 46 | 12.5B HKD (≈$1.6B) | 55 | 34 | |
| 47 | 1.9B CAD (≈$1.4B) | 54 | 52 | |
| 48 | 16.0B CNY (≈$2.2B) | 53 | 42 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score