Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Dine Brands Global, Inc.
How Dine Brands Global, Inc. stacks up
DIN · against 361 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Profitability
57/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #184 of 362 · scores higher than 49% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score26 peers with a profitability score of 50–59, including DIN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 57?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.A mix: stronger operating margin, but weaker return on assets than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 79% of peers. Return on assets: 0.4% vs peer median 3.3%
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 7.2% vs peer median 7.3%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 86% of peers. Operating margin: 16.3% vs peer median 6.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DIN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DIN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 349 reported | 7.2% | 9.5% | 40% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 362 reported | 16.3% | 7.1% | 84% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 358 reported | 0.4% | 4.1% | 24% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 315 reported | Not reported | 11.8% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 363 reported | 39.5% | 36.0% | 57% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DIN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.6B USD | 99 | 80 | |
| 1 | 2.4B USD | 99 | 65 | |
| 1 | 11.5B USD | 99 | 78 | |
| 1 | 10.7B USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 1 | 6.5B USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 179 | 1.1B USD | 60 | 55 | |
| 181 | 13.5B USD | 59 | 62 | |
| 181 | 1.6B USD | 59 | 63 | |
| 181 | 906M USD | 59 | 80 | |
| 184 | 447M USD | 57 | 29 | |
| 185 | 4.4B USD | 56 | 49 | |
| 185 | 7.0B USD | 56 | 59 | |
| 185 | 1.3B USD | 56 | 48 | |
| 188 | 7.0B USD | 55 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score