Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ATRenew Inc.
How ATRenew Inc. stacks up
RERE · against 1,603 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Profitability
59/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #651 of 1,604 · scores higher than 59% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score160 peers with a profitability score of 50–59, including RERE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 59?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.A mix: stronger return on invested capital and return on assets, but weaker operating margin than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 77% of peers. Operating margin: 2.2% vs peer median 6.4%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 73% of peers. Return on assets: 5.6% vs peer median 3.3%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 76% of peers. Return on invested capital: 14.7% vs peer median 7.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RERE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RERE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 1,510 reported | 14.7% | 7.3% | 76% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 1,601 reported | 2.2% | 6.4% | 23% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 1,528 reported | 5.6% | 3.3% | 73% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 1,476 reported | 12.4% | 7.7% | 68% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 1,613 reported | 20.7% | 30.2% | 33% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RERE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.48T JPY (≈$10.1B) | 100 | 96 | |
| 1 | 358.0B INR (≈$4.3B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 3 | 880.5B TWD (≈$27.3B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 3 | 981.2B JPY (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 3 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 84 | |
| 651 | 161.1B INR (≈$1.9B) | 59 | 57 | |
| 651 | 1.6B USD | 59 | 63 | |
| 651 | 17.7B ZAR (≈$972M) | 59 | 61 | |
| 651 | 726M EUR (≈$799M) | 59 | 39 | |
| 651 | 906M USD | 59 | 80 | |
| 651 | 65.2B INR (≈$782M) | 59 | 60 | |
| 651 | 147.5B INR (≈$1.8B) | 59 | 57 | |
| 667 | 4.4B CNY (≈$616M) | 58 | 73 | |
| 667 | 2.26T JPY (≈$15.4B) | 58 | 69 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score