Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Dine Brands Global, Inc.
How Dine Brands Global, Inc. stacks up
DIN · against 1,603 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Profitability
57/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #683 of 1,604 · scores higher than 57% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score160 peers with a profitability score of 50–59, including DIN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 57?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.A mix: stronger operating margin, but weaker return on assets than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 79% of peers. Return on assets: 0.4% vs peer median 3.3%
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 7.2% vs peer median 7.3%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 86% of peers. Operating margin: 16.3% vs peer median 6.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DIN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DIN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 1,510 reported | 7.2% | 7.3% | 50% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 1,601 reported | 16.3% | 6.4% | 86% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 1,528 reported | 0.4% | 3.3% | 21% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 1,476 reported | Not reported | 7.7% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 1,613 reported | 39.5% | 30.2% | 66% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DIN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.48T JPY (≈$10.1B) | 100 | 96 | |
| 1 | 358.0B INR (≈$4.3B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 3 | 880.5B TWD (≈$27.3B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 3 | 981.2B JPY (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 3 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 84 | |
| 683 | 118.6B JPY (≈$807M) | 57 | 66 | |
| 683 | 400.9B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 57 | 68 | |
| 683 | 250.7B INR (≈$3.0B) | 57 | 70 | |
| 683 | 2.0B EUR (≈$2.1B) | 57 | 48 | |
| 683 | 447M USD | 57 | 29 | |
| 683 | 40.1B THB (≈$1.1B) | 57 | 49 | |
| 683 | 327M GBP (≈$425M) | 57 | 46 | |
| 683 | 618M NZD (≈$371M) | 57 | 49 | |
| 683 | 57.1B INR (≈$685M) | 57 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score