Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Dana Incorporated
How Dana Incorporated stacks up
DAN · against 373 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
85/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #52 of 374 · scores higher than 86% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score46 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including DAN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 85?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 83% of peers. Earnings yield: 44.0% vs peer median 4.4%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.6% vs peer median 6.1%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 86% of peers. EBITDA yield: 15.7% vs peer median 8.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = DAN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | DAN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 373 reported | -1.5% | 5.5% | 9% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 382 reported | 17.8% | 9.8% | 89% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 147 reported | 4.6% | 6.2% | 34% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 375 reported | 75.7% | 47.3% | 68% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around DAN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.4B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 88 | |
| 1 | 9.9B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 1 | 2.6B GBP (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 4 | 10.1B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 4 | 248.4B JPY (≈$1.7B) | 98 | 73 | |
| 47 | 1.8B SGD (≈$1.4B) | 86 | 76 | |
| 47 | 4.8B USD | 86 | 67 | |
| 52 | 188.3B JPY (≈$1.3B) | 85 | 63 | |
| 52 | 3.6B USD | 85 | 54 | |
| 52 | 2.5B USD | 85 | 59 | |
| 52 | 1.6B USD | 85 | 63 | |
| 56 | 21.8B HKD (≈$2.8B) | 84 | 51 | |
| 56 | 18.1B HKD (≈$2.3B) | 84 | 54 | |
| 56 | 11.5B HKD (≈$1.5B) | 84 | 79 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score