Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CURB · against 750 other Real Estate companies
Ranked #107 of 751 · scores higher than 86% of peers · safety percentile 86
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)75 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including CURB · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and current ratio, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CURB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 733 reported | 0.28× | 0.82× | 83% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 742 reported | 0.62 | 0.69 | 56% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 751 reported | 2.65× | 1.20× | 82% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.5B HKD (≈$5.6B) | 100 | 42 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 3 | 1.7B THB (≈$47M) | 100 | 84 | |
| 4 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 5 | 2.0B HKD (≈$257M) | 99 | 55 | |
| 103 | 1.2B EUR (≈$1.3B) | 86 | 79 | |
| 104 | 677M HKD (≈$87M) | 86 | 77 | |
| 105 | 17.5B MYR (≈$3.9B) | 86 | 84 | |
| 106 | 56.1B AUD (≈$37.0B) | 86 | 70 | |
| 107 | 3.3B USD | 86 | 55 | |
| 108 | 5.9B USD | 86 | 74 | |
| 109 | 678M AUD (≈$447M) | 86 | 92 | |
| 110 | 1.5B USD | 85 | 53 | |
| 111 | 2.0B CNY (≈$277M) | 85 | 70 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score