Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to California Resources Corporation
How California Resources Corporation stacks up
CRC · against 386 other Energy companies
Valuation
22/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #301 of 387 · scores higher than 22% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score38 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including CRC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 22?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -2.7% vs peer median 5.2%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 69% of peers. EBITDA yield: 8.0% vs peer median 12.1%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 92% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 8.4% vs peer median 6.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CRC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CRC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 384 reported | -2.5% | 5.8% | 12% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 390 reported | 9.3% | 12.4% | 31% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 249 reported | 19.2% | 6.0% | 92% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 378 reported | 74.5% | 60.0% | 63% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CRC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$347M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 9.94T KRW (≈$7.2B) | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 2.2B MYR (≈$487M) | 99 | 60 | |
| 2 | 942M USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 517M CAD (≈$378M) | 99 | 47 | |
| 297 | 2.9B USD | 23 | 29 | |
| 297 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score