Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to TC Energy Corporation
How TC Energy Corporation stacks up
TRP · against 386 other Energy companies
Valuation
22/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #301 of 387 · scores higher than 22% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score38 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including TRP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 22?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 83% of peers. EBITDA yield: 6.4% vs peer median 12.1%
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 64% of peers. Earnings yield: 3.8% vs peer median 5.2%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 62% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 4.3% vs peer median 6.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TRP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TRP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 384 reported | 3.9% | 5.8% | 36% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 390 reported | 6.4% | 12.4% | 17% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 249 reported | 4.3% | 6.0% | 38% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 378 reported | Not reported | 60.0% | — | — | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TRP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$347M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 9.94T KRW (≈$7.2B) | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 2.2B MYR (≈$487M) | 99 | 60 | |
| 2 | 942M USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 517M CAD (≈$378M) | 99 | 47 | |
| 297 | 15.9B USD | 23 | 59 | |
| 301 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score