Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CRC · against 398 other Energy companies
Ranked #306 of 399 · scores higher than 23% of peers · safety percentile 23
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)40 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including CRC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CRC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 392 reported | 0.40× | 0.49× | 59% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 392 reported | 1.02 | 0.48 | 11% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 395 reported | 0.66× | 1.37× | 11% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$341M) | 100 | 71 | |
| 1 | 3.3B USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 4 | 41M USD | 99 | 25 | |
| 5 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 98 | |
| 302 | 1.0B USD | 24 | 24 | |
| 303 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 336M USD |
| 24 |
| 27 |
| 304 | 83.2B JPY (≈$566M) | 24 | 39 |
| 305 | 1.29T INR (≈$15.5B) | 24 | 56 |
| 306 | 4.6B USD | 23 | 17 |
| 307 | 7.1B NOK (≈$678M) | 23 | 28 |
| 308 | 22.3B NOK (≈$2.1B) | 23 | 72 |
| 309 | 2.2B USD | 23 | 60 |
| 310 | 1.0B USD | 22 | 69 |