Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to The Campbell's Company
How The Campbell's Company stacks up
CPB · against 798 other Consumer Defensive companies
Valuation
69/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #245 of 799 · scores higher than 69% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score80 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including CPB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 69?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield, EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 65% of peers. Earnings yield: 6.0% vs peer median 4.5%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 67% of peers. EBITDA yield: 11.6% vs peer median 8.7%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 69% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 10.4% vs peer median 6.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CPB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CPB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 771 reported | 6.0% | 4.5% | 65% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 812 reported | 11.6% | 8.9% | 67% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 312 reported | 10.4% | 6.3% | 69% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 767 reported | 58.8% | 54.4% | 53% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CPB| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 399.1B KRW (≈$287M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 242.6B KRW (≈$175M) | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 3.6B MYR (≈$796M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 101M SGD (≈$77M) | 100 | 89 | |
| 5 | 456M HKD (≈$58M) | 98 | 70 | |
| 245 | 265.7B JPY (≈$1.8B) | 69 | 76 | |
| 245 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score