Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CPB · against 801 other Consumer Defensive companies
Ranked #765 of 802 · scores higher than 5% of peers · safety percentile 5
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)81 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including CPB · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CPB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 784 reported | 1.79× | 0.44× | 10% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 792 reported | 0.05 | 0.32 | 84% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 788 reported | 0.81× | 1.53× | 15% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 159.9B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 74 | |
| 1 | 20.8B THB (≈$583M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 1 | 9.30T IDR (≈$577M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 60.4B THB (≈$1.7B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 5 | 968M MYR (≈$213M) | 100 | 94 | |
| 761 | 7.4B THB (≈$206M) | 5 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 19 |
| 762 | 4.8B USD | 5 | 34 |
| 763 | 10.4B CNY (≈$1.5B) | 5 | 21 |
| 764 | 35.5B USD | 5 | 40 |
| 765 | 6.5B USD | 5 | 37 |
| 766 | 128.5B USD | 4 | 46 |
| 767 | 15.5B HKD (≈$2.0B) | 4 | 55 |
| 768 | 2.6B EUR (≈$2.9B) | 4 | 34 |
| 769 | 3.2B CNY (≈$452M) | 4 | 4 |