Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
COLD · against 152 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Ranked #144 of 153 · scores higher than 6% of peers · safety percentile 12
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)17 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including COLD · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, current ratio and beta, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | COLD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 151 reported | 1.89× | 0.81× | 7% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 150 reported | 0.94 | 0.84 | 39% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 150 reported | 0.36× | 0.88× | 23% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.5B HKD (≈$5.6B) | 100 | 42 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 3 | 2.5B USD | 97 | 88 | |
| 4 | 3.3B USD | 97 | 78 | |
| 5 | 2.4B USD | 94 | 52 | |
| 140 | 23.7B SEK (≈$2.4B) | 13 | 46 | |
| 141 | 21.2B SEK (≈$2.1B) | 13 | 54 | |
| 142 | 3.4B USD | 12 | 17 | |
| 143 | 17.7B CNY (≈$2.5B) | 12 | 8 | |
| 144 | 4.2B USD | 12 | 18 | |
| 145 | 2.0B GBP (≈$2.6B) | 9 | 26 | |
| 146 | 56.7B SEK (≈$5.7B) | 9 | 49 | |
| 147 | 7.3B USD | 8 | 23 | |
| 148 | 4.5B USD | 7 | 49 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score