Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CNS · against 398 other Financial Services companies
Ranked #95 of 399 · scores higher than 76% of peers · safety percentile 76
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)40 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including CNS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Financial Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CNS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 349 reported | 0.19× | 0.57× | 70% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 394 reported | 1.22 | 0.67 | 18% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 372 reported | 6.64× | 2.04× | 80% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 344M MYR (≈$76M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 2 | 1.0B AUD (≈$674M) | 100 | ||
| 3 | 24.8B JPY (≈$168M) | 99 | 25 | |
| 4 | 0M MYR (≈$0M) | 99 | ||
| 5 | 4.0B SEK (≈$400M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 91 | 566M USD | 77 | 75 | |
| 92 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 659M USD |
| 77 |
| 72 |
| 93 | 24.3B USD | 77 | 67 |
| 94 | 259M USD | 77 | 71 |
| 95 | 3.8B USD | 76 | 58 |
| 96 | 1.2B CAD (≈$850M) | 76 | 69 |
| 97 | 9.50T IDR (≈$589M) | 76 | 54 |
| 98 | 12.7B USD | 76 | 63 |
| 99 | 2.0B USD | 75 | 26 |