Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ASST · against 398 other Financial Services companies
Ranked #99 of 399 · scores higher than 75% of peers · safety percentile 75
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)40 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including ASST · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and current ratio, which are stronger than most Financial Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ASST | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 349 reported | 0.00× | 0.57× | 94% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 394 reported | 13.24 | 0.67 | 0% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 372 reported | 7.62× | 2.04× | 81% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 344M MYR (≈$76M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 2 | 1.0B AUD (≈$674M) | 100 | ||
| 3 | 24.8B JPY (≈$168M) | 99 | 25 | |
| 4 | 0M MYR (≈$0M) | 99 | ||
| 5 | 4.0B SEK (≈$400M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 95 | 3.8B USD | 76 | 58 | |
| 96 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 1.2B CAD (≈$850M) |
| 76 |
| 69 |
| 97 | 9.50T IDR (≈$589M) | 76 | 54 |
| 98 | 12.7B USD | 76 | 63 |
| 99 | 2.0B USD | 75 | 26 |
| 100 | 157M USD | 75 | 79 |
| 101 | 501M EUR (≈$551M) | 75 | 58 |
| 102 | 1.8B USD | 75 | 73 |
| 103 | 16.7B CNY (≈$2.3B) | 74 | 27 |