Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cohen & Steers, Inc.
How Cohen & Steers, Inc. stacks up
CNS · against 366 other Financial Services companies
Growth
34/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #241 of 367 · scores higher than 34% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score37 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including CNS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 34?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth, which is weaker than most Financial Services peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 68% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 4.5% vs peer median 10.0%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 3.0% vs peer median 10.0%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 7.4% vs peer median 7.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CNS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CNS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 395 reported | 7.4% | 7.4% | 50% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 299 reported | 3.0% | 9.9% | 40% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 329 reported | 4.5% | 10.0% | 32% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CNS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 883M USD | 99 | 51 | |
| 1 | 322M USD | 99 | 58 | |
| 1 | 1.5B CHF (≈$1.7B) | 99 | 79 | |
| 1 | 16.5B GBP (≈$21.4B) | 99 | 41 | |
| 1 | 761M USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 234 | 37.5B THB (≈$1.0B) | 36 | 58 | |
| 238 | 7.1B HKD (≈$914M) | 35 | 48 | |
| 238 | 13.7B USD | 35 | 42 | |
| 238 | 38.4B USD | 35 | 22 | |
| 241 | 3.8B USD | 34 | 58 | |
| 241 | 26.0B GBP (≈$33.9B) | 34 | 73 | |
| 241 | 90.1B THB (≈$2.5B) | 34 | 57 | |
| 241 | 500M NZD (≈$300M) | 34 | 52 | |
| 245 | 403.2B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 33 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score