Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CNQ · against 31 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #19 of 32 · scores higher than 42% of peers · safety percentile 32
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)5 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including CNQ · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CNQ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 32 reported | 0.43× | 0.64× | 65% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 32 reported | 0.91 | 0.55 | 3% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 30 reported | 1.00× | 1.17× | 41% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.14T HKD (≈$146.3B) | 91 | 79 | |
| 2 | 17.70T INR (≈$212.4B) | 82 | 60 | |
| 2 | 163.7B EUR (≈$180.1B) | 82 | 70 | |
| 4 | 81.4B USD | 79 | 78 | |
| 5 | 173.5B USD | 76 | 65 | |
| 15 | 109.0B USD | 39 | 58 | |
| 16 | 135.8B USD | 38 | 60 | |
| 17 | 204.7B USD | 36 | 44 | |
| 18 | 108.0B USD | 32 | 55 | |
| 19 | 110.5B USD | 32 | 61 | |
| 20 | 122.6B USD | 30 | 32 | |
| 21 | 81.0B USD | 27 | 47 | |
| 22 | 404.0B BRL (≈$72.7B) | 21 | 39 | |
| 23 | 69.4B USD | 21 | 49 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score