Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
EPD · against 398 other Energy companies
Ranked #290 of 399 · scores higher than 27% of peers · safety percentile 27
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)40 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including EPD · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | EPD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 392 reported | 1.10× | 0.49× | 21% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 392 reported | 0.48 | 0.48 | 48% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 395 reported | 0.93× | 1.37× | 24% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$341M) | 100 | 71 | |
| 1 | 3.3B USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 4 | 41M USD | 99 | 25 | |
| 5 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 98 | |
| 286 | 517M CAD (≈$378M) | 28 | 47 | |
| 287 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 68.4B THB (≈$1.9B) |
| 28 |
| 66 |
| 288 | 5.5B EUR (≈$6.1B) | 28 | 69 |
| 289 | 8.2B CAD (≈$6.0B) | 28 | 49 |
| 290 | 81.0B USD | 27 | 47 |
| 291 | 3.7B EUR (≈$4.0B) | 27 | 42 |
| 292 | 4.3B CAD (≈$3.1B) | 27 | 20 |
| 293 | 7.40T CLP (≈$8.1B) | 27 | 43 |
| 294 | 614M MYR (≈$135M) | 26 | 49 |