Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TTE · against 398 other Energy companies
Ranked #255 of 399 · scores higher than 36% of peers · safety percentile 36
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)40 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including TTE · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Energy norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TTE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 392 reported | 0.48× | 0.49× | 51% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 392 reported | 0.06 | 0.48 | 82% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 395 reported | 1.06× | 1.37× | 33% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$341M) | 100 | 71 | |
| 1 | 3.3B USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 4 | 41M USD | 99 | 25 | |
| 5 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 98 | |
| 251 | 4.7B USD | 37 | 56 | |
| 252 | 12.7B NOK (≈$1.2B) | 37 | 48 | |
| 253 | 5.4B USD | 37 | 78 | |
| 254 | 22.6B CAD (≈$16.5B) | 36 | 66 | |
| 255 | 204.7B USD | 36 | 44 | |
| 256 | 1.2B USD | 36 | 49 | |
| 257 | 110.6B HKD (≈$14.2B) | 36 | 47 | |
| 258 | 52.4B USD | 35 | 47 | |
| 259 | 2.9B USD | 35 | 77 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score