Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TTE · against 386 other Energy companies
Ranked #135 of 387 · scores higher than 65% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score39 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including TTE · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
| Metric | TTE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 384 reported | 8.6% | 5.8% | 70% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 390 reported | 16.5% | 12.4% | 68% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 249 reported | 7.9% | 6.0% | 63% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 378 reported | 62.3% | 60.0% | 53% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$347M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 9.94T KRW (≈$7.2B) | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 2.2B MYR (≈$487M) | 99 | 60 | |
| 2 | 942M USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 517M CAD (≈$378M) | 99 | 47 | |
| 131 | 11.7B USD | 66 | 71 | |
| 131 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 674M USD |
| 66 |
| 45 |
| 135 | 767M CAD (≈$560M) | 65 | 35 |
| 135 | 26.1B NOK (≈$2.5B) | 65 | 51 |
| 135 | 204.7B USD | 65 | 44 |
| 135 | 17.6B USD | 65 | 31 |
| 139 | 266.1B CNY (≈$37.3B) | 64 | 61 |
| 139 | 19.2B CAD (≈$14.0B) | 64 | 65 |
| 139 | 1.0B SGD (≈$798M) | 64 | 53 |