Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CMTG · against 750 other Real Estate companies
Ranked #374 of 751 · scores higher than 50% of peers · safety percentile 50
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)75 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including CMTG · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker debt / equity and beta than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CMTG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 733 reported | 2.07× | 0.82× | 12% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 742 reported | 1.18 | 0.69 | 17% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 751 reported | 4.62× | 1.20× | 93% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.5B HKD (≈$5.6B) | 100 | 42 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 3 | 1.7B THB (≈$47M) | 100 | 84 | |
| 4 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 5 | 2.0B HKD (≈$257M) | 99 | 55 | |
| 370 | 89.0B JPY (≈$605M) | 51 | 47 | |
| 371 | 1.3B HKD (≈$165M) | 51 | 32 | |
| 372 | 2.0B HKD (≈$254M) | 51 | 49 | |
| 373 | 1.9B EUR (≈$2.1B) | 50 | 43 | |
| 374 | 157M USD | 50 | 19 | |
| 375 | 290M HKD (≈$37M) | 50 | 25 | |
| 376 | 2.5B EUR (≈$2.7B) | 50 | 63 | |
| 377 | 572M EUR (≈$629M) | 50 | 63 | |
| 378 | 5.7B SGD (≈$4.3B) | 50 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score