Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CME · against 268 other Financial Services companies
Ranked #196 of 269 · scores higher than 27% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score27 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including CME · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Financial Services peers.
| Metric | CME | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 410 reported | 3.9% | 5.6% | 35% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 206 reported | 4.3% | 6.8% | 32% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 183 reported | 3.9% | 6.1% | 35% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 401 reported | 24.3% | 83.1% | 17% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 498M USD | 100 | 90 | |
| 1 | 641M USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 82M USD | 99 | 78 | |
| 3 | 827M USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 3 | 659M USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 193 | 24.3B USD | 28 | 67 | |
| 193 | 188.7B USD | 28 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 45 |
| 193 | 2.7B USD | 28 | 58 |
| 196 | 23.7B CNY (≈$3.3B) | 27 | 59 |
| 196 | 109.3B USD | 27 | 53 |
| 198 | 333M EUR (≈$366M) | 26 | 45 |
| 198 | 709M USD | 26 | 32 |
| 198 | 16.2B USD | 26 | 37 |
| 201 | 90.7B USD | 25 | 33 |