Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CME · against 398 other Financial Services companies
Ranked #140 of 399 · scores higher than 65% of peers · safety percentile 65
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)40 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including CME · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger beta and debt / equity, but weaker current ratio than most Financial Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CME | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 349 reported | 0.15× | 0.57× | 73% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 394 reported | 0.27 | 0.67 | 85% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 372 reported | 1.02× | 2.04× | 20% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 344M MYR (≈$76M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 2 | 1.0B AUD (≈$674M) | 100 | ||
| 3 | 24.8B JPY (≈$168M) | 99 | 25 | |
| 4 | 0M MYR (≈$0M) | 99 | ||
| 5 | 4.0B SEK (≈$400M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 136 | 4.5B THB (≈$127M) | 66 | 68 | |
| 137 | 90.1B THB (≈$2.5B) | 66 | 57 | |
| 138 | 155.0B INR (≈$1.9B) | 66 | ||
| 139 | 45.4B JPY (≈$309M) | 65 | 79 | |
| 140 | 109.3B USD | 65 | 53 | |
| 141 | 197.1B BRL (≈$35.5B) | 65 | 60 | |
| 142 | 78M ZAR (≈$4M) | 65 | 78 | |
| 143 | 2.5B USD | 64 | 56 | |
| 144 | 12.9B ZAR (≈$710M) | 64 | 69 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score