Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CLX · against 95 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #63 of 96 · scores higher than 34% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score14 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including CLX · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
| Metric | CLX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 92 reported | 5.1% | 4.3% | 56% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 96 reported | 6.7% | 8.7% | 24% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 42 reported | 3.6% | 6.7% | 12% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 90 reported | 0.8% | 41.9% | 1% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 56.3B HKD (≈$7.2B) | 95 | 71 | |
| 2 | 7.2B USD | 92 | 72 | |
| 3 | 9.3B EUR (≈$10.2B) | 87 | 36 | |
| 3 | 7.8B USD | 87 | 83 | |
| 5 | 379.9B MXN (≈$20.5B) | 84 | 68 | |
| 59 | 8.97T KRW (≈$6.5B) | 40 | 38 | |
| 59 | 13.8B USD | 40 | 59 | |
| 59 | 20.5B CAD (≈$15.0B) | 40 | 48 | |
| 59 | 13.7B USD | 40 | 46 | |
| 63 | 11.3B USD | 39 | 35 | |
| 63 | 13.7B USD | 39 | 51 | |
| 65 | 9.8B EUR (≈$10.7B) | 38 | 36 | |
| 65 | 7.5B USD | 38 | 43 | |
| 67 | 1.68T JPY (≈$11.4B) | 37 | 64 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score