Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Chatham Lodging Trust
How Chatham Lodging Trust stacks up
CLDT · against 179 other Real Estate companies listed in US-listed
Growth
44/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #117 of 180 · scores higher than 34% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score25 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including CLDT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 44?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.A mix: stronger earnings per share growth, but weaker revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth than most Real Estate peers.
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 69% of peers. Revenue growth: -3.1% vs peer median 3.0%
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 68% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -1.0% vs peer median 3.8%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 70% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 34.0% vs peer median 11.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CLDT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CLDT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 182 reported | -3.1% | 5.9% | 15% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 133 reported | 34.0% | 13.9% | 67% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 174 reported | -1.0% | 4.8% | 20% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CLDT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 60 | |
| 3 | 517M USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 4 | 11.7B USD | 98 | 49 | |
| 4 | 34.7B USD | 98 | 45 | |
| 114 | 12.1B USD | 46 | 43 | |
| 114 | 48.0B USD | 46 | 44 | |
| 116 | 2.8B USD | 45 | 37 | |
| 117 | 522M USD | 44 | 30 | |
| 117 | 735M USD | 44 | 44 | |
| 117 | 530M USD | 44 | 62 | |
| 120 | 10.0B USD | 43 | 45 | |
| 120 | 1.1B USD | 43 | 32 | |
| 122 | 4.4B USD | 42 | 49 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score