Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.
How Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. stacks up
APLE · against 730 other Real Estate companies
Growth
42/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #421 of 731 · scores higher than 42% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score73 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including APLE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 42?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 66% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -2.8% vs peer median 11.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 1.2% vs peer median 3.0%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 3.1% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = APLE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | APLE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 741 reported | 1.2% | 3.0% | 42% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 464 reported | -2.8% | 11.1% | 34% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 718 reported | 3.1% | 3.8% | 47% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around APLE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 65.5B INR (≈$786M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 6.3B THB (≈$176M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 1 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 60 | |
| 5 | 3.1B CNY (≈$440M) | 99 | 67 | |
| 414 | 181M EUR (≈$199M) | 43 | 46 | |
| 414 | 1.0B CAD (≈$736M) | 43 | 44 | |
| 414 | 1.1B USD | 43 | 32 | |
| 421 | 1.4B HKD (≈$182M) | 42 | 49 | |
| 421 | 4.4B USD | 42 | 49 | |
| 421 | 18.8B THB (≈$527M) | 42 | 68 | |
| 421 | 5.0B GBP (≈$6.5B) | 42 | 40 | |
| 421 | Unavailable | 42 | 37 | |
| 421 | 338M EUR (≈$371M) | 42 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score